Peak Oil and Global Warming Essay

There is now much debate regarding whether the remaining oil supply can last to realize the worst of the negative effects of global warming. According to one controversial analysis done by scientists at the University of Uppsala based in Sweden, all fuel will be burned even before temperature levels become exceedingly hot (Coghlan, 2003). Although estimates on the remaining oil reserves are not the same, it is believed that oil will reach its peak by as early as 2010. The scientists say that combined oil and gas reserves amount to only 3,500 barrels which is less than the very optimistic figures from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (Coghlan, 2003). On the other hand, IPCC scientists defended that even if the oil reserves is not enough to constitute the more devastating effects of global warming, the burning of coal will more than make up for the deficiency. Nonetheless, both sides agree that burning coal is even more harmful (Coghlan, 2003). In a worst-case scenario, it is depicted that there is still 18,000 billion barrels of oil left but according to University of Uppsala geologist Kjell Aleklett that claim is â€Å"completely unrealistic† and that even the expected 8,000 billion barrels is more than double the remaining amount estimated by Sweden. The IPCC, however still argues that their predictions still has grounds using â€Å"a much broader and internationally accepted range of oil and gas estimates† and even if reserves of oil and gas do run out, there is still huge reserves of coal that may be burned for fuel or be converted into gasoline notwithstanding the fact that coal is much more harmful to the environment because it produces more emissions and particulates (Coghlan, 2003). Peak oil and global warming are two related problems and solving these two problems requires the same measures which is by reducing reliance on fossil hydrocarbon fuels. For America, coal, oil, and natural should be eliminated as a primary source of energy (Holson, 2007). Aside from being an energy source, oil is also being used as feedstock, particularly for the manufacturing of â€Å"plastics, pharmaceuticals, synthetic rubber, asphalt, lubricants, nitrogenous fertilizers, pesticides, and insecticides†. It is also an important resource for the military especially during periods of war (Holson, 2007). There are many other alternative sources of energy that produce basically no emissions and are renewable. Such energy sources include solar energy, wind energy, hydroelectric energy, and geothermal energy. These forms of energy sources have already proved efficient and effective yet many refuse to market it because of greater profit earned from oil and other exhaustible fossil fuels. Nuclear energy is another efficient energy source but this should be given much thought because nuclear power provides all sorts of other risks. The Kyoto Protocol is also a good recourse as it will aggregately reduce greenhouse gas emissions of countries that have committed to the protocol. Being one of the top producers of greenhouse gases, the US should also ratify the protocol, as currently, it is the only country that refuses to ratify the protocol after Australia agreed last year. US President George W. Bush that said reducing emissions would be bad for the US economy. However, failure of the US to do so will be bad for the rest of the world. Be it peak oil or global warming. The best recourse would be finding alternative energy sources. This would reduce oil consumption rate and oil will be available for a longer time avoiding the possibility of an extreme energy crisis. Alternative energy sources that literally produce no emissions would also be more beneficial to the environment.