Awake and Sing by Clifford Odet versus A Raisin in the...

Clifford Odets play, Awake and Sing, and Lorraine Hansberrys play, A Raisin in the Sun, both revolve around the struggle of attaining the American dream during the hardships of a struggling economy and most important the value of a family. By analyzing the main characters, Ralph and Walter, it can be seen that even though they wish to use the insurance money to fulfill their dream they eventually realize that with family they can survive through poverty. Both characters are being weighed down by poverty. This brings them to dream of the life they could live if one was giving a chance to get to first base and the other a chance to open up a liquor store. Ralph doesnt really seem to be interested in his family at first and is†¦show more content†¦Thats to bad, he tells his wife when she wants to talk to him about an abortion. The only solution both characters see to solve their problems is through money and not family. When Moe tells Ralph that his uncle has left him the insurance money and that he now has wings. Ralph has the option to take the money and go with his girl, but realizes he dont want life printed on dollar bills anymore. Also, that his uncle didnt die to fight over money and his family needs the money because times are getting worst more and more families on the street. He finally embraces his family as being the strength to help him get through tough times. Walter also believes money would solve all his families problems, but is not successful in achieving any of it. When his mother invests in the house he gets upset and goes to drink. He never takes into consideration that his son would have his own room and his wife can have the baby. He only thinks of him fulfilling his dream. Later, when his mom gives him money to deposit in the bank for his sisters tuition and to keep whats left over for the liquor store. He spends it all on the investment and gets robed for the money. While his family is being torn apart he feels that he could solve the

Are We Teaching An Effective Manner, And If It - 1432 Words

Education Evolved Having the largest frontal lobe of any animal, letting us process complex and abstract thoughts, we humans have a clear advantage when it comes to understanding our world (Lewis). It is a sad case when the human mind is not trained to make the most of it. Understanding our world is as fundamental to the human race as swimming is to fish. As John Dewey put it â€Å"...This process begins unconsciously almost at birth, and is continually shaping the individual s powers, saturating his consciousness, forming his habits, training his ideas, and arousing his feelings and emotions†. It does not matter if it takes place in a small tribe or on a national scale, we are always learning. The question is, are we teaching in an effective manner, and if not, how can we? Education has been with us since time immemorial. One definition of education according to Google Dictionary is â€Å"an enlightening experience† (Google Search). The thing about an enlightening experience is that no classroom is needed, anyone can have one at any time. The problem is that without any structured education, one individual might have such an enlightenment while another is left in the dark. A dissonance then arises between them. Such a simple thing as knowing and not knowing can lead to lower social status (Hickman) and lower quality jobs (Bernstein) among other discrepancies. Ideally education would bridge the gap between the privileged and the underprivileged. Sadly, we live in a world whereShow MoreRelatedWhat Effective Practice Really Means1690 Words   |  7 PagesIn everyday life if we want to improve on something that we have done, we must be open to reflection, so that we can identify our strengths and weaknesses and find areas that can be improved on. A s the GTCNI competence Framework states, â€Å"Teachers should keep curricular, subject and pedagogical knowledge up-to-date through reflection, self-study and collaboration with colleagues.† (Internet source 1) By taking this into consideration it is then evident that just like in everyday life, if teachersRead MoreEducation Philosophy and Rationale1846 Words   |  7 PagesEducation Philosophy and Rationale Every instructor or a teacher has a certain ideology that he or she follows throughout the teaching careers which underpins everything. These ideology or philosophy is based on our assumptions about our definition of learning and our views on the nature of mankind, the purpose of education, the nature of the curriculum, the role of the teacher and the learner, and the nature of the instructional process. Similarly, I had a certain philosophy which focuses on introducesRead MoreWood Butcher by Norman Hindley, Behind Grandmas House by Gary Soto, and Manners by Elizabeth Bishop954 Words   |  4 PagesHindley, Behind Grandmas House by Gary Soto, and Manners by Elizabeth Bishop For this paper I will be discussing three poems. They are Wood Butcher by Norman Hindley, Behind Grandmas House by Gary Soto, and Manners by Elizabeth Bishop. I will be examining the commonRead MorePoems: Family and Gary Soto926 Words   |  4 Pagess House by Gary Soto, and Manners by Elizabeth Bishop. I will be examining the common theme I found throughout the three poems. I found that to be how the relatives teach lessons to their relation of a younger generation and the different approaches to their teaching. To start off I will discuss the Wood Butcher by Norman Hindley. I believe the way the father taught the son was some what like an apprenticeship. The line I was your helper, and that first year We worked weekends through mostRead MoreMotivation And The Motivation Of The Learning Process1130 Words   |  5 Pagesaerospace, robotics and manufacturing. Instead of giving an inane introduction, I embed my research topics in the lectures so students can get an idea of how the technology is applied to the real world. I intend to soften the boundary between teaching and research so that students in my class realize they are not here for spoon-feeding but for solving a practical engineering problem. After students get motivated, it is time to show them the big picture of the course. That is, what they canRead MoreMy Experience At Pleasant Valley High School900 Words   |  4 PagesPleasant Valley High School, I believe that I have displayed many aspects of professionalism, which is a major component of my own teaching philosophy. I initially thought that professionalism meant outer appearance and appropriate language/behavior. I still do believe that this is a crucial part of professionalism. I am a firm believer in conducting myself in a manner that will represent my family, school, and students well. One example of my determination to act as a professional both in and outRead MoreHow Teacher Leaders Connect and Monitor Student Learning Essay1390 Words   |  6 Pageswith ensuring that all students receive a quality education regardless of race, origin, or learning ability. The purpose of this interview is to obtain effective teacher strategies that show how effective teachers are responsible for managing and monitoring student learning. In this interview, I asked four questions that support the delivery of effective instruction, as it relates to trends and issues in managing and monitoring student learning. There are also responses to questions about the strategiesRead MorePtlls Theory Assignment 11600 Wo rds   |  7 PagesPTLLS Theory Assignment 1 Review your role, responsibilities and boundaries as a teacher in terms of the teaching/ training cycle. Teaching is an extremely important profession as we are responsible for training up the future generations of our community, country and in effect, the world. In order to be a successful and effective teacher there are some basic skills and competencies that one must possess. The experiences that students have inside (and outside) our classrooms, schools and variousRead MoreAn assumption according to the oxford dictionary is defined as ‘A thing that is accepted as true or1600 Words   |  7 Pagesassumptions that we think are in our own best interests but that actually work against us in the long term.’ (Stephen D. Brookfield, 1995). Unfortunately, for teachers there are a lot of hegemonic assumptions out there regarding the best strategies to deal with classroom management, student – teacher relationship, disciplinary actions etc. but for this report I am going to discuss the one which was most evident in my experience during School Placement. Reflecting on my teaching practice one key hegemonicRead More My Teaching Philosophy Essay637 Words   |  3 PagesMy Teaching Philosophy Educational technology is a driving force to restructure schools. Technology is an appealing medium which can potentially facilitate effective teaching and learning as well as increase efficiency and productivity. At present, a variety of technologies are available to assist learners in the acquisition of knowledge and skills. Many of the new technologies can support research, analysis, problem-solving, and communication process more effectively than the traditional resources

Difference between Social and Traditional Business Models Free Essays

string(172) " countries that a central system is in place that makes it possible for water to be pumped into millions of households which might not be the case in developing countries\." Introduction Social business models are considered as a new innovation to the way organisations do business in the 21st century. These models to some extent contradict to the traditional business models, as the aim of latter is to primarily provide financial returns to shareholders. However, social business models have been conceptualised on the idea and rationale of contributing substantially to the community, and are built with the vision of achieving a social objective (Donaldson et al, 2011). We will write a custom essay sample on Difference between Social and Traditional Business Models or any similar topic only for you Order Now A social objective in this term may refer to socially responsible objectives which are aimed at improving the lives of individuals living within a community. Yunus and Weber (2010) for example, state that this could include setting up infrastructures and facilities and ensuring that individuals have an appropriate standard of living. However, the social responsibility of the social business model, seems to go one step further, which is to structure its business according to its social objective aim, which is in contrast to traditional business models that structure their businesses according to their core value offering, and only after profits have been made, would they now contribute a portion to their CSR objective. This essay is going to assess the business models adopted by social businesses, and compare them against traditional business models to ascertain whether, and to what extent, they are different from one another (1). Grameen Veolia Water Ltd is a water company that builds and operates water production and treatment plans in several poor villages in Bangladesh. It is a joint venture between a multinational corporation and local healthcare company which required an upfront investment of eight hundred thousand dollars. Their main aim is to develop projects in five villages, where the company would produce and deliver drinking water, which would then be sold at the factory location for a profit (Yunus Centre, 2009). In essence, the company’s business model was to identify a social problem – drinking water, and invest in infrastructure that would enable the company to meet the demand in the region. The water is being paid for, which enables the company to cover its investments. According to Yunus and Weber (2010), the profits from this investment are re-invested back into the business and enable the company to expand its operations and further assist in solving the problem of water short age in several other regions. The business model adopted by Grameen Veolia Water Ltd in Bangladesh can be considered as a social business model because it has a non-dividend, non-loss policy as depicted by Yunus and Weber (2010), which initially conceptualised the social business model. However, by comparing it against a similar business, it would be easy to identify to which extent they are similar, or different from the traditional business models. Thames Water is the UK’s largest water and wastewater Services Company which supplies millions of houses across London and 2.6 billion litres of tap water daily. Its primary business model, as seen from its website, is to build the relevant infrastructure required to pump millions of litres into London homes daily, and send them a monthly or quarterly bill. Basically, when reviewing both businesses, it seems that their models fit the same pattern, which is to build relevant infrastructures required to deliver water to customers. Grameen Veolia accomplishes tha t by delivering at the factory gate to individuals, whilst Thames Water accomplishes it by pumping into millions of London homes. The main question here is to determine if both models are different or the same lies in the definition of a business model itself. Chesbrough and Rosenbloom (2000) stated that the term business models, whilst frequently used to illustrate different strategies and functions within an organisation is not always explicitly defined. Authors offer a definition by KMLab, a consulting firm, which defines business models as â€Å"a description of how [a] company intends to create value in the market place. Business models include the unique combination of products, services, images and distributions that a particular company carries forward. It also includes the underlying organisation of people and the operational infrastructure that they use to accomplish their work†. (2). Also, Magretta (2002) describes a business model as the method of doing business in which an organisation sustains itself and generates revenues by specifying its position in the value chain. From all these definitions states that a business model describes how an organisation utilises its resources in order to generate revenues. Several busi ness models exist, and they are usually distinct based on the industry within which they operate. Linder and Cantrell (2000) for example, in their Accenture publication state that business models differ based on their unifying concept, and include price models, convenience models, experience models, channel models, and trust models, all of which define how a company does business and generates revenue. Even though they do not specify exactly what a traditional or social business model entails, the term business model is unique amongst both terms and therefore it is safe to assume that every other business model, apart from the â€Å"social business model† – is a traditional business model. Furthermore, in trying to ease the commonly held confusion about what actually constitutes a business model, Linder and Cantrell (2000) outlined the components of a business model, which in essence entail the various factors that constitute any business model. These components seek to further explain the fact that a business model is limited to the process in which a business creates value for its shareholders and generates revenues. Referring back to the water businesses that have been outlined earlier, it is clear that both entities create value by making water accessible. Thames Water manages the problem by creating the relevant infrastructure, and pumping millions of water into households daily, while Grameen Veolia has accomplished that by selling it directly to individuals. This could only be achieved due to the level of infrastructure available that makes it possible for the company to achieve this feat. It is probably only in developed countries that a central system is in pl ace that makes it possible for water to be pumped into millions of households which might not be the case in developing countries. You read "Difference between Social and Traditional Business Models" in category "Essay examples" They may not have the relevant infrastructure, especially in remote towns in Bangladesh where Grameen Veolia has chosen to operate. However, this presents a viable business opportunity. If a company were established in these locations that offered a low cost approach to getting clean fresh water, then it would succeed. This follows on from a similar strategy adopted by Wal-Mart in the 1950’s when it chose to focus on remote towns where there was little infrastructure which has created difficult barriers to entry for competitors. Even though Sam Walton’s (Wal-Mart’s founder) goal was not inherently social, by targeting these markets and offering them value – everyday low prices on big brands, they managed to achieve astronomical su ccess. According to Therefore, socially, Grameen Veolia may be accomplishing a social objective, and in the process, providing a poor society with affordable water, but they are investing private money into this feat, and consequently making profit out of this investment, which inherently, according to the definition of a business model, is a traditional business. The only difference between this model and that of Thames Water in the UK is the availability of infrastructure, which has made theirs more appropriate for their environment. Since this essay has now established that the basic business model of both the traditional business and the social business are the same, the next step is to identify their major differences and ascertain whether that constitutes to the deviation from the traditional business model. According to Yunus and Weber (2010), the key characteristics of a social business are for the business objective to overcome poverty; attain financial and economic sustainability, return back the initial investment capital of investors; retain profit in the business for expansion and improvement; environmental consciousness; and market wage alongside better than standard working conditions for the workforce. However, based on Linder and Cantrell’s (2000) discussion on the constituents of a business model, alongside other definitions used in this study, it seems that these characteristics do not constitute the definition of a business model, but more like the CSR policy of an organisation. According to Kotler and Lee (2005), â€Å"corporate social responsibility is a commitment to improve community well-being through discretionary business practices and contribution of corporate resources†. By the use of the term discretionary, Kotler and Lee disregard companies that are obligated to act socially because of the law, or because it is ethical or moral and therefore expected. It defines businesses that choose to do good for their community based on internal policies. Therefore, based on this definition, it seems that social business models, as defined by Yunus and Weber (2010), may inherent identify (3) traditional business models that have a CSR policy centred on targeting the community. Furthermore, their investor reimbursement model, which specifies a non-dividend, non-loss policy, in which the investor gets back only what they invested is essentially only a policy and in no way affects their business model of delivering value to customers and increasing revenue. Even though this model may deter investors that seek a return on their invested capital, it could also attract investors such as Google for example, who have a CSR initiative, and may view it as a method of diversifying their portfolio with a social investment. Therefore, based on these arguments, it seems that the major factors that distinguish a social business model, from that of a traditional business, are the CSR initiatives and the investor models, which are seemingly only company policies that have minimal effect on how companies create value and increase revenue. The minimal effect that these policies have on creating value, could however define how they distinguish themselves from competitors – if any, and appeal to customers, employees and investors (Petit and Yunus, 2010). For instance, if there were two companies operating within the same market, offering the same goods and adopting the same model – one of which was a social business and the other a more traditional business, the social business may gain more traction and popularity from more ethically conscious and socially responsible customers. This argument is based on CSR theories of Kotler and Lee (2005), which depict that an organisation’s CSR policies could assist it its competitive advantage, especially in the sort of customers and employees it could attract. This essay has reviewed the business models of two water companies, with the aim of identifying their underlying business structure, and determining whether and to what extent, the social business model of a Bangladeshi water company differs from the traditional business model of a UK water company. Our analyses show that business models of both companies are ideally traditional business models, but they have been adapted to fit the particular environment within which they operate. However, the core aspects of a business model, which are the value creation for customers and increasing profits, apply to both organisations. Therefore, based on the arguments set out in this paper and the discussion of both business models, it appears that the social business models are only a mere re-invention of the traditional business models, in that they seek to create customer value and generate profit. However, their core difference lies in their CSR and investor models, which is centred majorly o n improving a social factor. This model is ideal from a social perspective as it actively combines a traditional model, with a non-for- profit agenda. It can be therefore concluded that social business model would give any aspiring business an advantage over its competitors especially in generic industries, as some customers, employees and investors may be attracted to its social goals and objectives. Reference List Baker, M. J. (2011) Why ‘Social Business’Social Business, Vol. 1 (1), pp. 1 – 15. Chesbrough, H. and Rosenbloom, R. S. (2000). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporations’ technology spinoff companies, Harvard Business Review Working Paper. Donaldson, C., Baker, R., and Cheater, F. (2011) Social business, health and well-being, Social Business, Vol. 1(1), pp. 17 – 35 Kotler, P., and Lee, N. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: doing the most good for your company and your cause, John Wiley and Sons, 307 pages Linder, J. and Cantrell, S. (2000) Changing Business Models: Surveying the Landscape. Accenture Institute for Change. May 24, 2000. Magretta, J. (2002). Why business models matter. Harvard Business Review. Petit, P. U., and Yunus, M. (2010) Creating a New Citilization through Social Entrepreneurship, Transaction Publishers, pp. 170. Thames Water (2010) Our business, http://www.thameswater.co.uk/cps/rde/xchg/corp/hs.xsl/825.htm [Accessed: 27/04/10] Yunus Centre (2009) Grameen Veolia Water Ltd – Background, http://www.muhammadyunus.org/Social-Business/grameen-veolia-water-ltd/, [Accessed: 27/04/10 Yunus, M., and Weber, K. (2010) Building Social Business: The New Kind of Capitalism That Serves Humanity’s Most Pressing Needs, Public Affairs, 226 pages How to cite Difference between Social and Traditional Business Models, Essay examples